![]() ![]() Start with Revit with a construction-oriented model.Here is the thought process for Analysis and building layout design intent: The simplest recommendation to start from is that if we need to end up with Revit, it’s better to start with Revit. ![]() Likely to connect design outcomes to detailing (or maybe also fabrication coordination). I’m reading that you need to use Robot and Revit for their complementarity and to end up in Revit with a construction model and documentation. I’ll try to connect some dots, so please assess whether this will be helpful and relevant to your needs or not. I was referring to your original question about the model automation. I'm starting to wonder if software companies have any meaningful interaction with everyday practicing engineers who just need to deliver.Īpologies for not being clear. No mater the combination of software, steel connections must be modeled twice. It is discouraging that the he competitive software packages offer no alternatives that I'm aware off. ![]() Up until 2022, at least some of the connections could be modelled just once. I'd like to point out that having to model all of the steel connections twice in the era of BIM is driving me crazy. I also understand that there are no plans for transfer of steel connections (and reinforcement) between robot and revit, as I could find no reference in the roadmap.Īs a structural engineer working mainly on steel structures, I think that the evolution of this software package has taken two steps behind. Dear your answer I understand that the workflow that was described above is correct and it is the only way to work for an undetermined period of time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |